Sports

Decent12 · Posted by: Decent12 - 03-29-2020, 09:24 PM - Forum: Hobbies - Replies (2)

Hello guys, as I have been watching sports events getting postponed or cancelled its a bit disappointment for me but for sure life comes first as I am a lover of cricket and almost all big events of cricket got cancelled or postponed just like PSL, IPL and international tours also got cancelled.
I am just wondering what gonna happen if this coronavirus remains everywhere like now?

Decent12

Hello guys,
I was just wondering which site API should i use for detection of proxy/VPNs as I am currently using this site -> https://www.ipqualityscore.com/ but so far i noticed they are a little bit inaccurate and sometimes this site VPN detector API fails at some time.
If you know any accurate VPN detection API site kindly tell me.

Littlemaster

INTRODUCTION

Hello dear developers,
Today I am going to review VPS 1 sponsored by Host4Fun. I am very happy to get the chance to use this VPS. The VPS simply performing as per my needs. I hope it will also do the same for you.

VPS INFORMATION

Code:
DISK SPACE : 100 GB HDD

RAM : 1 GB

MONTHLY TRAFFIC : 1 TB

vSWAP : 1 GB

IPv4 : 1

CONNECTION SPEED : 1 Gbits/S

CONTROL PANEL : VIRTUALIZER

VIRTUALIZATION : KVM

LOCATION : ROUBAIX, FRANCE

PROCESSOR : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz, 1 cores

System uptime : 43 days, 8 hours, 55 minutes

Most of this info is from Post4VPS VPS Information page and webmin, and it is accurate.

BENCHMARKS

Post4VPS Benchmark Script Result
System Info
-----------

Terminal

Processor : Intel® Core™ i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz
CPU Cores : 1
Frequency : 4199.996 MHz
Memory : 990 MB
Swap : 1023 MB
Uptime : 43 days, 9:37,

OS : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7.x86_64
Hostname : Littlemaster

Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------

Terminal

Your public IPv4 is hidden

Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 6.70MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 1023KB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 412KB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 850KB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 2.85MB/s

Sao Paulo, Brazil Softlayer 1.86MB/s

Singapore Softlayer 1.79MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 463KB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 1.76MB/s

Nuremberg, Germany Hetzner 8.14MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 7.91MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 7.56MB/s
Milan, Italy Softlayer 7.91MB/s

Melbourne, AU Softlayer 354KB/s
Sydney, AU Softlayer 364KB/s

Disk Speed
----------

Terminal

I/O (1st run) : 288 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 315 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 401 MB/s
Average I/O : 334.667 MB/s

Geekbenchmark V4 Result (view full information)

Geekbenchmark V5 Result (view full information)
[Image: 1Sze5zcUD]

UnixBench Result:

Speedtest Result

CONCLUSION

As per my experience the VPS 1 sponsored by Host4Fun is a stable server having good network speed. But the speed test result showed by the benchmarks showing slow network considering a 1 Gbit/s server. Currently I am hosting an educational website on it. I am happy with the performance of this server.

Thanks to Host4Fun Team & Post4VPS community.

Neoon

Everyone needs cheap dedis, so I decided to create metaDedi.
metaDedi is a comparison table from multiple providers, updated every 1 or 10 minutes.

So you can find easy a good deal, with a few clicks.
As usual, no tracking or ad’s nor affiliates.

In case you miss a deal, we have Discord & Email notifications available.
If you have any suggestions, or notice any errors, lemme know.

Neoon.

Littlemaster

Hi,
i am trying to add updated apk file to playstore, but I have no certificate used to sign the previous version. I have no key files.
play console says the certificate is different.
some searches says to create duplicate project. But is it against terms?
How can I solve the issue. Support chat is not available currently.

ikk157 · Posted by: ikk157 - 03-27-2020, 06:41 PM - Forum: VPS Reviews - Replies (10)

Hello everyone!

First off, just like my previous review, I apologize for the lack of formatting. It’s a complete nightmare on mobile.

Today I’ll be writing a review on HostLease’s VPS 3 (not the same as the VPS 3 in the post4vps plans).

And what better way to start off than with some benchmarks:

Terminal

System Info
-----------
Processor: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores: 4
Frequency: 397.500 MHz
Memory: 1024 MB
Swap: 512 MB
Uptime: 10 min,

OS: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel: 3.10.0-1062.4.2.vz7.116.7
Hostname: {removed by me}

Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is {removed by me}

LocationProviderSpeed
CDNCachefly48.6MB/s

Lenoir, NC, USDacentec12.6MB/s
Dallas, TX, USSoftlayer6.41MB/s
Seattle, WA, USSoftlayer8.90MB/s
San Jose, CA, USSoftlayer5.87MB/s
Washington, DC, USLeaseweb6.42MB/s

Tokyo, JapanLinode2.93MB/s
SingaporeSoftlayer5.47MB/s
TaiwanHinet3.79MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net31.8MB/s
Haarlem, NetherlandsLeaseweb39.4MB/s

Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run) : 675 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 604 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 697 MB/s
Average I/O: 658 MB/s or .65 GB/s

(Credits to @"Hidden Refuge" for the benchmarking script)

UnixBench results:

Terminal

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: {removed by me}: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-1062.4.2.vz7.116.7 -- #1 SMP Mon Dec 9 19:36:21 MSK 2019
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
01:40:06 up 12:14, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.11, 0.08; runlevel Mar

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 28 2020 01:40:06 - 02:08:11
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29236765.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3679.6 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1921.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 365444.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 96250.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 900896.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 569752.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 121907.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4345.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4012.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 581.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 356689.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29236765.1 2505.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3679.6 669.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1921.2 446.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 365444.6 922.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 96250.0 581.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 900896.5 1553.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569752.0 458.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 121907.4 304.8
Process Creation 126.0 4345.5 344.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4012.8 946.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 581.0 968.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 356689.5 237.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 657.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 28 2020 02:08:11 - 02:36:18
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29480213.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3672.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1873.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 363723.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 97190.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1030002.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 563308.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 115017.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4922.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4353.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 532.0 lpm (60.4 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 362456.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29480213.4 2526.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3672.9 667.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1873.8 435.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 363723.2 918.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 97190.2 587.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1030002.4 1775.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 563308.2 452.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 115017.2 287.5
Process Creation 126.0 4922.8 390.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4353.7 1026.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 532.0 886.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 362456.6 241.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 667.9

Additional information not in the benchmark:

Virtualization technology: OVZ3
Panel: Virtualizor
Host: HostLease

My thoughts on the VPS:

First and foremost, VPS 3 from HostLease is insanely fast! It’s much faster than my VPS9 in pretty much everything! From establishing the ssh connection to running programs, it’s lightening fast!

Also, I really appreciate that it comes with a panel, that way I can do everything myself without having to constantly rely on someone else (which caused some recent unnecessary trouble with VPS9).

In addition, the amount of CPU cores is absolutely astonishing! Definitely a great VPS for CPU demanding tasks!

Furthermore, @Pacific Spirit who is the owner of HostLease is extremely friendly! That plays a vital role in the overall experience of the VPS. He’s always kind and polite, and will never say no to any of your requests!

To conclude, VPS 3 from HostLease is a great VPS, from the it’s great performance, to the overall usage experience. Not to mention that it’s completely free!

Thank you for reading my review. I’m open to any suggestions into making it better.

Littlemaster

Hi,
I am developing an android app using android studio. I have tried different devices in AVD manager but all of the emulators are very slow and I could not even test my app on it. So I mostly build apk and transferred to my phone for testing.
Currently I have made some mistake and the app seems closing while I open the app. I could not use logcat due to the AVD issue. What can I do?
I could not find the mistake.

Khadeer143

Hello everyone I suggest you guys a server which is freeroam seftrver name had default freeroam p ,server total MB is 100 ,total online player :150+/daily ,this server runs from past 5 years its one of my best freeroam server the server is less lag,goodping, much players to play around I suggest the MTA players to join this server which is really fun to play

Khadeer143

Hello I jus made my own duel system for MTA sa hope you guys like it watch the full video

fChk · Posted by: fChk - 03-25-2020, 01:42 PM - Forum: Tutorials - Replies (2)

I think it's time to document my experience with the free EUServ VPSs from the perspective of being IPv6-only.

Running an IPv6-only VPS in today's still predominantly IPv4-based has challenges of its own. Of course, the degree will vary depending on your situation's specifics. Thus, I'll not try in anyway to be exhaustive but just document my steps at addressing them, given my own use-cases, starting with the most important in this OP.

Connecting you to an IPv6-only VPS: not that easy!
First things first; it happens that my ISP connectivity is still IPv4-only and, to make matters worse, it's heavily using NAT (Network Address Translation). In this situation you're already running into your first problem of not being able to reach your VPS.

IPv4 and IPv6 are 2 incompatible protocols, but there are ways that try to make them communicate with each other. IPv4/IPv6 interoperability is a large subject that I won't get into here. Suffice it to say that there are two ways to address the issue in my own situation:

Use of a dual stack VPS that will serve as your 'private gateway' to the IPv6-only VPS. The most basic way to do this is just to SSH into your dual stack VPS; and from there SSH again into your IPv6-only VPS. It can't get simpler than this.
use of IPv6 Teredo Tunnelling (RFC-4380.) -On linux machines, by installing and running miredo, you create a pseudo-interface called 'teredo' -by default- that will get assigned a dynamic IPv6 address, thus exposing you to the Internet -after been practically invisible inside your ISP's NAT (this is important and you should consider shoring up your defences while merido service is running.)

Code:
ifconfig teredo

teredo: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST>  mtu 1280

        inet6 fe80::269e:709d:c56f:964d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>

        inet6 fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>

        inet6 2001:0:53aa:64c:***:****:***:****  prefixlen 32  scopeid 0x0<global>

        unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  txqueuelen 500  (UNSPEC)

        RX packets 50  bytes 7458 (7.2 KiB)

        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0

        TX packets 73  bytes 8446 (8.2 KiB)

        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

I won't get into the details but just saying that the Teredo IPv6 address is recognizable by its 2001:0 prefix and the 53aa:64c part is mapped to the Teredo server IPv4 address while the rest is user's related (IPv4 address + ports used.)

So now we've finally did it and logged into this IPv6-only VPS; then what?!

Connecting IPv6-only VPS to the IPv4-Internet :
This part was easy to sort out, thanks to @'Hidden Refuge' tip in his OP of the free EUServ VPSs Offer. From the links he provided, I ended up here (Public NAT64 service) and here (NAT64/DNS64 public test.)

My systemd-resolved config file @'/etc/systemd/resolved.conf' looked like this:

Code:
[Resolve]

DNS=2a01:4f8:c2c:123f::1 2a01:4f9:c010:3f02::1 2a00:1098:2c::1

FallbackDNS=2001:67c:2b0::4 2001:67c:2b0::6

Using a NAT64/DNS64 gateway is a matter of redirecting your traffic via their routers by simply using their nameservers.

Now that this is out-of-the-way, what about running a Web server?

Running a Web Server:
Not much of a difference configuration-wise, just make sure to make HTTPD/Nginx listen to the adhoc-interfaces that are IPv6-enabled and let CloudFlare (CF) do the routing of the IPv4-traffic for you, because in this case nothing else work, AFAIK.

Thus, you'll need to use both CF DNS and proxying services for your website to be universally accessible. I'm assuming that this is trivial knowledge, thus I won't dwell on it much longer.

For a TLS-enabled website, I always opt for the full strict option when it comes to CF-enabled websites.

One important issue I faced in the case of Nginx is that OCSP Stapling fails on IPv6-only hosts!!..

Code:
2020/03/25 09:52:20 [error] 7371#0: unexpected response for ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org

2020/03/25 11:04:46 [error] 7371#0: connect() to 23.55.163.68:80 failed (101: Network is unreachable) while requesting certificate status, responder: ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org, peer: 23.55.163.68:80, certificate: "/etc/letsencrypt/live/srvxyz.blue.kundencontroller.de/fullchain.pem"

The cause is Nginx prioritizing IPv4 addresses over IPv6:

Code:
[root@ipv6VPS ~]# host ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org

ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org is an alias for ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org.edgesuite.net.

ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org.edgesuite.net is an alias for a771.dscq.akamai.net.

a771.dscq.akamai.net has address 23.55.163.68

a771.dscq.akamai.net has address 23.55.163.48

a771.dscq.akamai.net has IPv6 address 2a01:4a0:1338:28::c38a:ff10

The fix:

Code:
server {

    ...

    ssl_stapling on;

    ssl_stapling_responder http://[::1]:8082;

    ...

}

server {

    listen [::1]:8082;

    location / {

        proxy_pass http://ocsp.int-x3.letsencrypt.org;

    }

}

For more on this issue, please see 'OCSP stapling non-functional on IPv6-only host'

I'll stop at this point, and may add other IPv6-specific issues when they come to light, so can anyone else who has found something of his own. Please share!

Login

Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting